References

Cohen, Jacob. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press.

Cumming, Geoff. 2012. Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. Routledge.

Davis, James A. 1985. The Logic of Causal Order. Sage.

de Groot, Adrianus Dingeman. 1969. Methodology: Foundations of Inference and Research in the Behavioral Sciences. Mouton.

Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 2013. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Efron, B. 1979. “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife.” Ann.Statist. 7 (1): 1–26.

Efron, Bradley. 1987. “Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 (397): 171–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410.

Field, Andy P. 2024. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 6th ed. SAGE Publications.

Fishbein, M., and J. N. Cappella. 2006. “The Role of Theory in Developing Effective Health Communications.” Journal of Communication 56 (s1): S1–17. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00280.x/full.

Fisher, R. A. 1919. “The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52 (2): 399–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800012163.

Hainmueller, Jens, Jonathan Mummolo, and Yiqing Xu. 2016. How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739221.

Hayes, Andrew F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.

Hoekstra, Rink, Richard D Morey, Jeffrey N Rouder, and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. 2014. “Robust Misinterpretation of Confidence Intervals.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21: 1157–64.

Holbert, R. Lance, and Esul Park. 2019. “Conceptualizing, Organizing, and Positing Moderation in Communication Research.” Communication Theory, ahead of print, April. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006.

Lehmann, E. L. 1993. “The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Theories of Testing Hypotheses: One Theory or Two?” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 (424): 1242–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476404.

Neyman, Jerzy. 1937. “Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 236 (767): 333–80.

O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2007. “Brief Report: Post Hoc Power, Observed Power, a Priori Power, Retrospective Power, Prospective Power, Achieved Power: Sorting Out Appropriate Uses of Statistical Power Analyses.” Communication Methods and Measures 1 (4): 291–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450701641375.

Rains, Stephen A., Timothy R. Levine, and Rene Weber. 2018. “Sixty Years of Quantitative Communication Research Summarized: Lessons from 149 Meta-Analyses.” Annals of the International Communication Association 42 (2): 105–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1446350.

Rogers, R. W. 1975. “A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1: The Journal of Psychology: Vol 91, No 1.” THe Journal of Psychology 91 (1): 93–114. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803?casa_token=tnl4hHdJsB0AAAAA:T1RIciCaIhUSOxB2By3Ah9nZPbufTPANLbbdgCujfE-yZr6cugamG3pBECgsGroUDXf02-k1XlEzOw.

Sawilowsky, Shlomo. 2009. “New Effect Size Rules of Thumb.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100.

Tannenbaum, Melanie B., Justin Hepler, Rick S. Zimmerman, et al. 2015. “Appealing to Fear: A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeal Effectiveness and Theories.” Psychological Bulletin (United States) 141 (6): 1178–204.

Wasserstein, Ronald L., and Nicole A. Lazar. 2016. “The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose.” The American Statistician 70 (2): 129–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.

Wilkinson, Leland. 1999. “Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations.” American Psychologist 54 (8): 594.