References
Bullock, John G., and Shang E. Ha. 2011. “Mediation Analysis Is
Harder Than It Looks.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental
Political Science, edited by James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green,
James H. Kuklinski, and ArthurEditors Lupia, 508–22. Cambridge
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452.035.
Cohen, Jacob. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral
Sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cumming, Geoff. 2012. Understanding the New Statistics: Effect
Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. New York:
Routledge.
Davis, James A. 1985. The Logic of Causal Order. Beverly Hills,
CA: Sage.
de Groot, Adrianus Dingeman. 1969. Methodology:
Foundations of Inference and
Research in the Behavioral Sciences.
Book, Whole. The Hague: Mouton.
Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 2013. Intrinsic
Motivation and Self-Determination
in Human Behavior. Springer Science &
Business Media.
Efron, B. 1979. “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the
Jackknife.” Ann.Statist. 7 (1): 1–26.
Efron, Bradley. 1987. “Better Bootstrap Confidence
Intervals.” Journal of the American Statistical
Association 82 (397): 171–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410.
Fishbein, M., and J. N. Cappella. 2006. “The Role of Theory in
Developing Effective Health Communications.” Journal of
Communication 56 (s1): S1–17. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00280.x/full.
Fisher, R. A. 1919. “The Correlation Between Relatives on the
Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.” Transactions of the
Royal Society of Edinburgh 52 (2): 399–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800012163.
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer. 1955. “Statistical Methods and Scientific
Induction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series B
(Methodological) 17 (1): 69–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983785.
Hainmueller, Jens, Jonathan Mummolo, and Yiqing Xu. 2016. “How
Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models?
Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice.” https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739221.
Hayes, Andrew F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and
Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford
Press.
Hoekstra, Rink, Richard D Morey, Jeffrey N Rouder, and Eric-Jan
Wagenmakers. 2014. “Robust Misinterpretation of Confidence
Intervals.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21:
1157–64.
Holbert, R. Lance, and Esul Park. 2019. “Conceptualizing,
Organizing, and Positing Moderation in
Communication Research.” Communication
Theory, April. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006.
Lehmann, E. L. 1993. “The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Theories of
Testing Hypotheses: One Theory or Two?” Journal of the
American Statistical Association 88 (424): 1242–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476404.
Neyman, Jerzy. 1937. “Outline of a Theory of Statistical
Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability.”
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.Series A,
Mathematical and Physical Sciences 236 (767): 333–80.
O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2007. “Brief Report: Post Hoc Power, Observed
Power, a Priori Power, Retrospective Power, Prospective Power, Achieved
Power: Sorting Out Appropriate Uses of Statistical Power
Analyses.” Communication Methods and Measures 1 (4):
291–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450701641375.
Rogers, R. W. 1975. “A Protection
Motivation Theory of Fear
Appeals and Attitude Change1:
The Journal of Psychology:
Vol 91, No 1.” THe Journal of
Psychology 91 (1): 93–114. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803?casa_token=tnl4hHdJsB0AAAAA:T1RIciCaIhUSOxB2By3Ah9nZPbufTPANLbbdgCujfE-yZr6cugamG3pBECgsGroUDXf02-k1XlEzOw.
Sawilowsky, Shlomo. 2009. “New Effect Size Rules of
Thumb.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical
Methods 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100.
Wasserstein, Ronald L., and Nicole A. Lazar. 2016. “The ASA
Statement on p-Values: Context,
Process, and Purpose.” The American
Statistician 70 (2): 129–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
Wilkinson, Leland. 1999. “Statistical Methods in Psychology
Journals: Guidelines and Explanations.” American
Psychologist 54 (8): 594.